Analysis of the Discourse and Rhetoric since September 11 Essay

phratry 11, 2001. After terrorists hijacked four American airliners, toppling the World Trade marrow in impudent York and damaging the Pentagon just outside Washington, magniloquence in various circles of the West among authors, theorists, and pundits centered around a number of interest topics. The nature of evil has become a topic over which some(prenominal) debate and rhetoric has ensued. Some have used it as a means by which they can explain these actions, whereas others see it as an parapet to a proper explanation. Even others see it as false, but a necessary falsehood for the war effort. Furthermore, the debate over if, or the purpose to which, United States and Western foreign policy contributed to these attacks has also stirred passions on both sides of the argument.My intention is to engage in an analysis of the discourse and rhetoric since September 11. Discourse can be defined as the turnout of knowledge through language ( residency 201). Certainly, events s uch(prenominal) as those that occurred on September 11 lead to a production of knowledge, or, at the least, attempts at understanding. vocabulary is being used in very interesting ways by many people in an attempt to produce knowledge or understanding since September 11. I have selected both domain figures and intellectuals for this wandering(a) evaluation in order to make a sufficient analysis. thither is a dichotomy between the context within which public figures such as the Reverend Billy Graham and President George W, Bush chat and academics or literary figures such as Stanley Fish, Edward Said, and Salman Rushdie. Part of this dichotomy, undoubtedly, exists because of the accountability of public figures to those they represent.One of the first references to evil in the wake of t... ...ction to Modern Societies. Ed. Stuart Hall et al. Polity Press. 184-227.Kurtz, Stanley. Edward Said, Imperialist. The Weekly Standard. 8 October 2001 33-35.Rushdie, Salman. Fighti ng the Forces of Invisibility. The Washington Post. October 2, 2001 A25.--------. Yes, This Is About Islam. The New York Times. 2 November 2001. 12 declination 2001 .Said, Edward. Islam and the West are inadequate banners. The Observer. 16 September 2001. 12 December 2001. .---------. The Clash of Ignorance. The Nation. 22 October 2001. 12 December 2001 .Williams, Raymond. Keywords A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York Oxford University Press, 1985.