Saturday, February 23, 2019

A Schenkerian Analysis of Preludio from Bach’s Unaccompanied Violin Partita Essay

Very a few(prenominal) theorists touch upon the topic of motivic and structural coherence in lives dance suites. The keyboard and lute suites deservedly have more published analyses than the string suites considering there ar simply more of them loss the cello and fiddle suites pristine and practically untouched, and unjustifiably so. The most faint are the fiddle suites, particularly the BWV 1006 in E major. With the exception of the comfortably-known published analysis by Schenker of the Preludio, Carl Schachters analysis of the Gavotte en Rondeaux, no other analysis clear be found of this partita.Building on Schenker and Schachter, I present my own Schenkerian analysis of the Preludio. With the help of David Beachs retain on unity in bach suites and Joel Lesters book on bachs solo violin deeds, I conduct motivic and structural coherence in this partita with some observations that apply to all of Bachs violin suites. Bach composed six unaccompanied works for the viol in in the year 1720, three Sonatas da chiesa and three Partitas. The partita, as understood during Bachs time, was a set of conversions as single might infer, this definition implies that some or all movements of each partita are variations of each other.The BWV 1006 has s level(p) movements and the only violin partita that begins with a prelude. David Beach addresses the small-scale gear two of three violin Partitas in his book, observing the importance of the populate motion as a motivic pattern in the master key and second gear Partitas. I wish to call attention to the great signifi cigaretce of the populate motion that is present in the terzetto Partita as well. The Preludio opens with a lower-neighbor mannequin E-D-E, and the figure occurs within every modulation. Its noteworthy that Urlinie itself, in fact, contains an partial neighbor.The Gavotte en Rondeaux is the literal embodiment of the variation concept. Being the only violin partita with a rondel movement, the notion that a partita is a set of variation is most evident by dint of this partita. Regarding Gavotte en Rondeaux, Carl Schachter suggests that as the episodes increase in complexity, the ritornello seems more and more parenthetical. In a sense the two episodes can be organically tie in over the ritornello, and thus the concept of the Rondo is realized even more so beyond its surficial sectionalized design. inveterate with this notion, I suspect that as a whole, the movements of BWV 1006 can be linked together specifically because it is a set of variations, despite its superficial differences. structural coherence of the partita can be inferred from the Preludio. The penning is typically heard as two sections that are quite connatural, while this division seems insignificant, it suggests a elusive element of variety. Being a prelude, it would not be presumptuous to model either oneness the two things the other movements will have similar two-part divisions, or other mov ements will also have varying sections.To urge an in-depth analysis of the Preludio, I have produced foreground and middle ground graphs. However, I made my graphs after consulting Schenkers own analysis of the Preludio. As one of Schenkers earlier analyses, it is noteworthy that he indicates the Urlinie as an 8-line this octave-line interpretation creates more problems than a reading from 3. However, the basic, fundamental idea Schenker presented provides a blueprint for a reading, which, in my view, is more accurate. Schenker offered FIG. 1 in conjunction with the 8-line Urlinie, without specifying exactly what the race is.I propose that Schenker intuited the significance of the neighbor motion in the Urlinie, and read 8 as a cover tone. From Schenkers figure above I present my notion of the unelaborated upper neighbor FIG. 2. The de-emphasis of the move 3 as a passing tone from 4 to 2 lends importance to the incomplete upper neighbor A, supported by IV. This gathered tona l area stretches over half of the Preludio. A reprise of an crack passage at the initiation of the A prolongation gestures its independence from its surrounding, so a smaller organism enveloped within the larger animal.This is evident by the indwelling auxiliary cadence to A that accompanies the tonal area IV. In retrospect, the IV is already a long-term goal from the beginning. The first 58 measures properly set the stage for the emergence of IV. The first step on the path to IV is the movement to VI as a short goal. This is done by first moving to G (m. 39) through F (m. 37), creating a deuce-ace attainment E-F-G in the process. The G is employed first in the top voice as primary tone and then in the mysterious as pedal point, also the fifth to the entree C (m. 51) FIG 4.EX. 1.The C, in a sense, is a midway lemniscus point from E major on its way to A major. A in measure 53 leads to B, creating yet another third progression G-A-B. The B is to be read not as V of E sca rce as II of A, unfolding to tonic through two consecutive fifths B-E-A EX. 2. As we shall see, the contour of the bass forecasts what is to come to boot this prelude within the Preludio presents the material for further elaboration and development. Now securely in A, a memorable passage from measures17-28 is restated in the natural key, as though a second beginning.This reiteration casts upon listeners a sense of home, even though the music has strayed to a new tonal area. As I stated before, the 58-measures prelude will matured and grow in its new environment. The bass progression moves in the similar contour as the premature 58 measures. The F (VI) in the bass being a third below A, serves as a short-term goal as a midway stopping point on its way to D (V65). The long-term relationship between A and D results in a tri-tone which intensifies the arriver of V E, 4.The midway F is unfolded from G the same manner as the unfolding of A from B, through two consecutive fifths F-D-G E, 3. The inhering Urlinie is initiated by C over A in E, 2, and falls upon an implied B above the D as 2, the B is prolonged over the V in a 6-5 motion E, 5. The path between V on its way affirm to I is quite sophisticated. In the treble, a ensuant circle of fifths is used to take the fifths (E-B) to the octaves (A-A) E, 5. 5. With an 8-7 motion, the A octave becomes a B7 chord. The B acts as pedal point at this point in the bass E, 6.As the seventh of B resolves to G, B leaps a third to D, which then is registrally shifted to a lower register through arpeggiation. The low D then compose out a D7 chord reaching a high A, thus the end of the inside Urlinie is reached. It should be noted that Schenker pointed out a large-scale voice exchange, consisting of B and D between measure 120 and measure 128 see foreground graph pg. 8. The V in the bass arpeggiation is now approached with utmost anticipation as the weight of the entire Preludio shifts upon its imminent arrival with only a few measures left, one has to onder in what magnificent way the V will be executed to counterbalance the monumental build to the IV? As the internal Urlinie is fulfilled in measure 131, two descending third progressions in parallel sixths E, 7 bring forth the most dramatic, German style of violin execution one dotted quarter B7 quadruple stop that brings the Preludio to a single halt, as the V is finally in place. The effective but swift gesture is sustained by A, the seventh, no longer an incomplete upper neighbor but supported by V. As the A moves through G to F, a 7-6-5 motion is created over V as Urlinie scale degree 2 is reached E, 8.The bass returns home to its original tonic E in measure 137, and the Urlinie is satisfied as well with E in the treble. The last two measures are coda, finishing the piece in a similar manner as it opened, unfolding itself back into the high E through two octaves. Extended bow proficiency is demanded to perform the Preludio, possibly more so tha n the other movements but that is not to say the big shifts and the frequent adjusting to unconventional positions is any more cheerful for the left hand. The consistent stream of sixteenth notes in a dissipated ? nvokes immediate association to a keyboard prelude. Furthermore, the six-fold voices created through exploiting the full verify of the instrument allows for keyboard features such as pedal point, register shifts. Combined with multiple subject entries and modulations, this piece contains mature Baroque characters of a Bach keyboard prelude. Ironically, Bach wrote such a prelude for a most unsuitable instrument, perhaps with the knowledge that only with correct and virtuosic execution can its full mean effect be achieved. As I begin to understand the finding of each note, I play the piece better.Mindless playing and practicing is unfulfilling and futile, and can only produce the most stiff and lifeless imitations of music, if I whitethorn quote Schenker. As for the is sue concerning unity in all of Bachs work, both Lester and Beach discussed first two violin partitas at length but strangely failed to address the last partita, I weigh the research on this topic remains incomplete without consideration of this partita. It would be interesting, if not absolutely necessary to look into the rest of the partita to see what it has to offer.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.